ACBL
Board of Directors
I just returned from from Chicago where I spent the
weekend working with four other ACBL board members on a restructuring
plan to reduce the size of the ACBL Board of Directors. The Task Force
was headed by David Lodge from District 22 (Southern California). Other
members of the Task Force are A.J. Stephani from District 11 (Ohio),
Jay Whipple from District 9 (Florida) and Margot Hennings from District
6 (Washington, DC).
The current ACBL Board of Directors is composed of
25 representatives from 25 different geographic areas in the United
States and Canada. When you have twenty-five people trying to come to
a meeting of the minds, it is an incredibly difficult process. The Board
also spends a great deal of time on bridge related issues that could
and should be done by outside committees and management.
Numerous studies show that the optimal size for problem-solving
teams is about six people. After there are seven people in a decision-making
group, each additional member reduces decision effectiveness by 10%.
Our task was to find a way to reduce the board in size
while honoring the knowledge and service of our existing board members
and assuring that all the functions currently being performed will be
performed by the appropriate committees.
We started by reviewing all the different suggestions
and plans that have been proposed to reduce the ACBL board over the
last twenty years before brainstorming about what we might suggest that
would be different enough to be both make the ACBL board more efficient
and improve board focus on the big issues that are paramount.
After two days of meetings we agreed upon a plan that
will reduce the size of the ACBL board from 25 to 13 members. This will
be accomplished by combining adjoining districts that will logically
be joined into 13 Regions. The existing Districts will remain intact
so there will be no changes to District Treasuries, NAP or GNT events,
but the combined Regions will send one representative to the Regional
Board.
Under the plan, District 4 will be combined with District
3 and instead of two District Directors, there will be one Regional
Director representing the area.
We felt it was not in the best interest of the organization
to make a drastic change in the size of the ACBL Board. Our current
Board has a wealth of knowledge and experience that should be honored,
so we have made the reduction in the ACBL Board on a gradual basis,
providing for each sitting director to finish the balance of their term
and serve an additional three year term during the transition.
Although financial reasons were not the impetus for
the restructure, there will be a savings of more than $100K a year when
the transition is complete.
The next step in the process is to bring a motion to
the Board of Directors in San Francisco for their vote. Since the restructuring
requires changes to the by-laws we will need a two-thirds majority to
begin the transition.
I am confident that our Board of Directors will put
personal interest aside and support this much needed change.